Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
37
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 28.5% 37 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2022 — — 15.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 60.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Darcey Engen Board Member 10.2% of Rev
Luverne Seifert Artistic Director 10.2% of Rev
Joy Dolo Board Member 2.7% of Rev
Claudine Arndt Board President —
Nina Clark Secretary —
Sonja Kuftinec Board Member —
Katie Code Board Member —
Charles Adams Board Member —
James Lekatz Board Member —
Eriq Nelson Board Member —
Mary McReynolds-Pellinen Board Member —
Barbara Shatarian Board Member —
Kim Koeppen Board Member —
Andy Halper Board Member —
Stuart Stoller Treasurer —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Darcey Engen Board President —
Luverne Seifert Board Member —
Joy Dolo Board Member —
Katie Code Board Member —
Stuart Stoller Treasurer —
Sonja Kuftinec Board Member —
Nina Clark Secretary —
Robert Cowgill Board Member —
Behany Krepela Board Member —
Claudine Arndt Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Darcey Engen Board President —
Luverne Seifert Board Member —
Joy Dolo Board Member —
Katie Code Board Member —
Stuart Stoller Board Member —
Sonja Kuftinec Board Member —
Nina Clark Board Member —
Robert Cowgill Board Member —
Behany Krepela Board Member —
Claudine Arndt Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 256 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 19 points below the peer median (42 vs. 61).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 31 → 37 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.