Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 5.0% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 16.3% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 40.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLARE COSTELLO Board Member 4.0% of Rev
DRAKE SHRADER VICE PRESIDE
TIMOTHY COSTELLO Board President
RYAN DIX Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLARE COSTELLO Board Member 2.6% of Rev
CLARE COSTELLO EXECUTIVE DI 2.6% of Rev
DRAKE SHRADER VICE PRESIDE 1.5% of Rev
DRAKE SHRDER VICE PRESIDE
TIMOTHY COSTELLO Board President
BRETT BAUER Secretary
RYAN DIX Treasurer
TIMOTHY COSTELLO Board President
BRETT BAUER Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLARE COSTELLO Board Member 13.5% of Rev
DRAKE SHRDER Board Member 12.5% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (75 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.