Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 61 Stable Stable Watch
2023 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 62 Stable Stable Watch
2021 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 40 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANIELLE COZHAIR Board President
ROBERT ZARAGOZA Board President
STEPHANIE RODRIGUEZ Treasurer
IIANA BRONGIEL Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DINA NICHOLS Board President
ROBERT ZARAGOZA Board President
STEPHANIE RODRIGUEZ Treasurer
KATY DAVIS Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 57 points above the peer median (90 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 61 over 5 years (improving by 21 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.