Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
43
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 48.6% 43 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 24.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALLISON BROWN Executive Director 49.5% of Rev
ALLISON BROWN Executive Director 48.6% of Rev
JENNIFER SCHNEIDER Board President
LARA GOLDEY Secretary
TRACEY STURGILL Board Member
CORRINE HURT Board Member
AMY DEVRIES Board Member
JENNIFER SCHNEIDER Board President
LARA GOLDEY Secretary
TRACEY STURGILL Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALLISON BROWN Executive Director 48.6% of Rev
JENNIFER SCHNEIDER BOARD CHAIRMAN
LARA GOLDEY Secretary
DONNA NELSON Treasurer
CHRISTINA MIZERAK Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sara McAtee Board Member
Laura Goldey Secretary
Ross Hanson Board Member
Donna Nelson Treasurer
Jennifer Schneider Chairman
Jason King Board Member
Martin Hadley Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 24 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 20 points above the peer median (65 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 48.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.