Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 27.6% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Toni LeFebvre Board President 4.9% of Rev
Steve Shanley Board President 4.9% of Rev
Alan Feirer Treasurer 3.0% of Rev

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Alan Feirer Treasurer 4.9% of Rev
Toni LeFebvre Board President 4.9% of Rev
Steve Shanley Board President 4.9% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALAN FEIRER Board President 4.4% of Rev
JASON PENTICO PAST CO-CHAI 4.4% of Rev
STEVE SHANLEY Board President 4.4% of Rev
TONI LEFEBVRE Board President
BRUCE PEIFFER Board Member
KELLY WEBER Board Member
RYAN MEYER Board Member
DAMEON PLACE Board Member
KELLI SWEHLA Board Member
GREG SIMMONS Board Member
SETH SNAKENBURG Board Member
DAVE KOVARNA Board Member
DRAKE VAN ROEKEL Board Member
DREW BALTA Board Member
RICH MEDD Board Member
JOEL NAGEL Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 86 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points above the peer median (55 vs. 39).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.