Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 42 Fragile Recovery
2022 18.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 20.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 27.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 25.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 21.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 25.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 21.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 30.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carson Fishman Executive Director
Jean Andrews Artistic Director
Erick Pew Board Member
Amanda Watson Choreographer
Nate Thomas Talent Manager

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carson Fishman Executive Director 4.2% of Rev
Nate Thomas Talent Manager 2.6% of Rev
Jean Andrews Artistic Director 2.1% of Rev
Amanda Watson Choreographer 0.5% of Rev
Erick Pew Board Member 0.4% of Rev

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carson Fishman Executive Director 4.2% of Rev
Dawn Howell Unspecified Role 2.1% of Rev
Jean Andrews Unspecified Role 1.4% of Rev
Amanda Watson Unspecified Role 0.9% of Rev
Erick Pew Unspecified Role 0.7% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carson Fishman Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
Dawn Howell Unspecified Role 1.8% of Rev
Jean Andrews Unspecified Role 1.4% of Rev
Amanda Watson Unspecified Role 0.9% of Rev
Erick Pew Unspecified Role 0.7% of Rev
n Unspecified Role
Amanda Watson Unspecified Role
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 17 other orgs in ID with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.