Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
Overall
40
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 17.1% 40 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GARY CORDELL DIRECTO OF PROGRAMMING 41.2% of Rev
GARY CORDELL DIRECTO OF PROGRAMMING 41.2% of Rev
DON J THOMPSON Executive Director
KENNY RAMPTON PRESIDENTARTISTIC DIR
CURT MILLER Board President
DANIEL PHILIPPUS Treasurer
JULIANA MCRAE Secretary
DON J THOMPSON Executive Director
KENNY RAMPTON PRESIDENTARTISTIC DIR
CURT MILLER Board President
DANIEL PHILIPPUS Treasurer
JULIANA MCRAE Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DON J THOMPSON Executive Director
KENNY RAMPTON PRESIDENTARTISTIC DIR
CURT MILLER Board President
DANIEL PHILIPPUS Treasurer
JULIANA MCRAE Secretary
CLINT HOLMES Board Member
GARY CORDELL DIRECTO OF PROGRAMMING
DAVE CLARK Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GARY CORDELL DIRECTO OF PROGRAMMING 17.2% of Rev
DON J THOMPSON Executive Director
KENNY RAMPTON PRESIDENTARTISTIC DIR
CURT MILLER Board President
DANIEL PHILIPPUS Treasurer
JULIANA MCRAE Secretary
CLINT HOLMES Board Member
DAVE CLARK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 6 other orgs in NV with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points below the peer median (15 vs. 46).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.