Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 42 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 43 Fragile Recovery
2019 9.5% 40 Fragile Recovery
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE CRISTYSON Board President
KEVIN LUMBY Treasurer
COLLEEN LONGVILLE Secretary
MELISSA KOZUB Board Member
LETITIA LOPEZ Board Member
JENNIFER WILLIAMS Board Member
JESSICA CAMERON Board Member
ERIN RUDY Board Member
BRITTANY DEAN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE CRISTYSON Board President
KEVIN LUMBY Treasurer
COLLEEN LONGVILLE Secretary
MELISSA KOZUB Board Member
ROBERT OVERY Board Member
LETITIA LOPEZ Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JANE CRISTYSON Board President
KEVIN LUMBY Treasurer
COLLEEN LONGVILLE Secretary
ANNABEL BRYAN Board Member
MELISSA KOZUB Board Member
ROBERT OVERY Board Member
ANTHONY SMITS Board Member
LETITIA LOPEZ Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (25 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.