Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
22
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2021 22.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 30.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 46 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT H MANN CAO 14.5% of Rev
DEBRA ANN MUMM Executive Director 8.0% of Rev
Rebecca Dant Secretary
Angela Maciel Gibbons Board Member
Brittany North Board Member
Ron Withrow Board Member
Aaron Butcher Board Member
Debra Ann Mumm Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Debra Ann Mumm Board President
Rebecca Dant Secretary
Annette Andersen Treasurer
Steve Hill Board Member
Angela Maciel Gibbons Board Member
Brittany North Board Member
Ron Withrow Board Member
Aaron Butcher Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 22 over 4 years (declining by 7 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.