Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2022 | — | — | 22.6% | 58 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | 17.3% | 59 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Extein | Executive Director | 35.8% of Rev | ||
| Rebecca Gray | Board Member | — | ||
| Sara Quintanar | Board Member | — | ||
| Geannine Roman | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Extein | Executive Director | 22.6% of Rev | ||
| Rebecca Gray | Board Member | — | ||
| Sara Quintanar | Board Member | — | ||
| Tarik Qureshi | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Extein | Executive Director | 17.0% of Rev | ||
| Rebecca Gray | Board Member | — | ||
| Sara Quintanar | Board Member | — | ||
| Tarik Qureshi | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Extein | Executive Director | — | ||
| Rebecca Gray | Board Member | — | ||
| Sara Quintanar | Board Member | — | ||
| Tarik Qureshi | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 66 points above the peer median (100 vs. 34).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 22.6% is modestly above the sector's healthy band (18–22%) — worth monitoring.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 22.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.