Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
18
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 20.6% 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 28.4% 13 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 12.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 7.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 16.8% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROBERT HERRERA Treasurer —
RYAN KENNEDY Board Member —
SARAH LAMB Board Member —
LAURA LLOYD Board Member —
FAITH MEISINGER-PETIT Secretary —
ALEX NEWMAN Board Member —
MOISES VELAZQUEZ Board Member —
MELISSA WHITEMARSH Board Member —
DAN YOUNG Board President —
JILL YOUNG Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMIE MACPHERSON Board Member 22.3% of Rev
JAMIE MACPHERSON Board Member 20.6% of Rev
DAN YOUNG Board President —
SAM SWEET Board President —
ROBERT HERRERA Treasurer —
ZACH PHILLIPS Secretary —
RYAN KENNEDY Board Member —
MOISES VELAZQUEZ Board Member —
JENNIFER GALLAGHER Board Member —
MELISSIA WHITMARSH Board Member —
DALLAS SHAW Board Member —
DON NICHOLSON Board Member —
JEN FRENCH Board Member —
ADRIENNE CASALE Board Member —
JOHN HAWKINS Board Member —
DAN YOUNG Board President —
SAM SWEET Board President —
ROBERT HERRERA Treasurer —
ZACHARY PHILLIPS Secretary —
JOHN HAWKINS Board Member —
DALLAS SHAW Board Member —
RYAN KENNEDY Board Member —
MOISES VELAZQUEZ Board Member —
JENNIFER GALLAGHER Board Member —
MELISSA WHITMARSH Board Member —
DON NICHOLSON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAN YOUNG Board President —
SAM SWEET Board President —
ROBERT HERRERA Treasurer —
ZACHARY PHILLIPS Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
18 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 9 other orgs in DE with NTEE prefix A3.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 80 points below the peer median (0 vs. 80).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.