Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 53 Fragile Recovery
2021 4.1% 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 8.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 13.1% 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOEL SHEPPARD Treasurer
JASON HOLLBACK Secretary
LIZ MARTIN Board President
TIM SCHACHT VICE PRESIDE
DENNIS SCHULZE PAST PRESIDE

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHIRLEY CRAGO Treasurer
LIZ MARTIN Board President
TIM SCHACHT VICE PRESIDE
DENNIS SCHULZE PAST PRESIDE
SUSAN BUNSOLD WILSON Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH BARR EXECUTIVE DI 20.1% of Rev
DENNIS SCHULZE PAST PRESIDE
SUSAN BUNSOLD WILSON Secretary
MIKE AQUILLO VICE PRESIDE
CHAD HIBBS Treasurer
JESSI LANDON Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH BARR EXECUTIVE DI 18.4% of Rev
BRUCE DANIELS VICE PRESIDE
DENNIS SCHULZE Board President
BETH SEITER Secretary
ANDREW SMARRA Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points above the peer median (45 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.