Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
58
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 58 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 62 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADAM REEVE Board President
RACHEL REEVE Treasurer
DEBBIE SANTOS Board President
DEB MANNING Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADAM REEVE Board President
RACHEL REEVE Treasurer
MAURISA MEYER Board President
PHIL STAMERIS Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK B ADLER Board President
RACHEL REEVE Treasurer
MAURISA MEYER Board President
PHIL STAMERIS Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK B ADLER Board President
RACHEL REEVE Treasurer
CHRISTINE STAMERIS Board President
PHIL STAMERIS Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 48 points above the peer median (90 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.