Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
30
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 40.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 41 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bethany Sorenson Operations Manager 13.6% of Rev
Ellen McKenzie Board Member 10.8% of Rev
Brenda Griggs Board Member 8.9% of Rev
Malcolm Lowe Board Member 7.5% of Rev
Joan Bessac Steelquist Board President
Jonathan Rose Treasurer
Katharine Azzolini Secretary
Sherry Bloker Bookkeeper
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
30 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 16 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (15 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 40.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~38 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.