Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | 40.8% | 30 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 43 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 35 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 39 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethany Sorenson | Operations Manager | 13.6% of Rev | ||
| Ellen McKenzie | Board Member | 10.8% of Rev | ||
| Brenda Griggs | Board Member | 8.9% of Rev | ||
| Malcolm Lowe | Board Member | 7.5% of Rev | ||
| Joan Bessac Steelquist | Board President | — | ||
| Jonathan Rose | Treasurer | — | ||
| Katharine Azzolini | Secretary | — | ||
| Sherry Bloker | Bookkeeper | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 16 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (15 vs. 42).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 40.8% is well above the sector's 90th percentile (healthy band: 18–22%).
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 40.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~38 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.