Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEATRICE HOLT Board Member
JANE GOODWIN Board Member
JESS FRONCKOWIAK Board Member
MICHAEL T HARTLEY Board President
BONNIE B HARTLEY Secretary

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BEATRICE HOLT Board Member
JANE GOODWIN Board Member
JESS FRONCKOWIAK Board Member
MICHAEL T HARTLEY Board President
BONNIE B HARTLEY Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESS FRONCKOWIAK Board Member
JANE GOODWIN Board Member
BEATRICE HOLT Board Member
BONNIE BROWN HARTLEY Secretary
MICHAEL HARTLEY Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JESS FRONCKOWIAK Board Member
JANE GOODWIN Board Member
BEATRICE HOLT Board Member
BONNIE BROWN HARTLEY Secretary
MICHAEL HARTLEY Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 244 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.