Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
56
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 56 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 53 Fragile Recovery
2022 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brenden Elwood Artistic Director
Kimberly Borum Board President
Wynter Elwood Treasurer
Karen Chang Secretary
Jim Snyder Board Member
Melissa Carter Board Member
Alex Otto Board Member
Chris Clark Board Member
Mark Bryant Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Brenden Elwood Treasurer 1.1% of Rev
Wynter Elwood Board Member 1.1% of Rev
Wanda Boe Board President 0.6% of Rev
Melisa Carter Board Member 0.6% of Rev
April Davis Secretary
Ed Benson Board Member
David Beegle Board Member
Robin Walbeck-Forrest Artistic Director
Peter Cook Book Keeper
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
56 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points above the peer median (80 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.