Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 10.6% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 12.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 13.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 17.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 17.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 15.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 6.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 0.7% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 6.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 7.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALLAN R SCOTT Board Member 11.4% of Rev
VICTORIA CECH Board Member
MADDIE COLLINS Board Member
MATT DALTON Board Member
DAVID GENTER Board Member
PATRICK KEIM Board Member
RON LUKENBILL Board Member
WILLIAM SHROP SHROPSHIRE Board Member
ERIC STERN ESQ Board Member
HANNA WARHANK ESQ Board Member
RON WATERMAN ESQ Board Member
KALI WICKS Board President
ALISON PAUL ESQ Treasurer
RON BLADWIN Board Member
ART BUMGARDNER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALLAN R SCOTT Board Member 10.6% of Rev
SARA GROVES Board Member 0.5% of Rev
PAT KEIM Board President
ALISON PAUL ESQ Treasurer
ART BUMGARDNER Board Member
VICTORIA CECH Board Member
MADDIE COLLINS Board Member
MATT DALTON Board Member
KRISTIN DREES Board Member
DAVID GENTER Board Member
RENEE LISTON Board Member
RON LUKENBILL Board Member
ERIC STERN ESQ Board Member
RON WATERMAN ESQ Board Member
KALI WICKS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALLAN R SCOTT Board Member 12.0% of Rev
PAT KEIM Board President
RON LEE Board President
ALISON PAUL ESQ Treasurer
ELEANOR PARKER ESQ Secretary
ART BUMGARDNER Board Member
VICTORIA CECH Board Member
MADDIE COLLINS Board Member
MATT DALTON Board Member
KRISTIN DREES Board Member
RON LUKENBILL Board Member
RENEE LISTON Board Member
TIM REARDON Board Member
ERIC STERN ESQ Board Member
RON WATERMAN ESQ Board Member
KALI WICKS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 17 other orgs in MT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points below the peer median (0 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 27 → 31 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.