Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↑
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | 18.7% | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 21.9% | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERICA BROWNE | Executive Director | 18.6% of Rev | ||
| RACHEL MONACO | Board President | — | ||
| ERIONIA DIXON | Board President | — | ||
| BRANDON MALACARA | Treasurer | — | ||
| DAIANA SZEF | Secretary | — | ||
| AARON BERNSTEIN | MEMEBER | — | ||
| GENITA WALKER | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erica Browne - Current | Executive Director | 9.8% of Rev | ||
| Emily Nolan - 2022 Executive Direct | Former ED, Founder | 4.4% of Rev | ||
| Angelique Lewis | Board President | — | ||
| Brandon Malacara | Treasurer | — | ||
| Rachel Monaco | Secretary | — | ||
| Erionia Dixon | Board Member | — | ||
| Aaron Berstein | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 104 other orgs in WI with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points below the peer median (15 vs. 37).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 18.7% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
- Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.