Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
33
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 64.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 70.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 48.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 11.3% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 51.3% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 52.6% 16 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Hubert Artistic Director 33.9% of Rev
Lisa Greim Manager 16.3% of Rev
Chappell Kingsland Accompanist 10.2% of Rev
Richard and Diana Krueger Music Librarians 2.0% of Rev
Accountant 1.7% of Rev
Jessie Whitcher Accountant 0.3% of Rev
Sharon Messbarger Board President
None Board President
Kesia Catuccio Secretary
Deb Morrow Treasurer
Joyce Dominguez Board Member
Chris Varner Board Member
Peter Munson Board Member
Craig Biesterfeld Board Member
Thalassa Martinez Board Member
Sarah Rutherford Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marla Wasson Artistic Director 26.6% of Rev
Deborah Morrow General Manager 16.3% of Rev
Chappell Kingsland Accompanist 10.2% of Rev
Richard and Diana Krueger Music Librarians 2.0% of Rev
Kara Sakulich Board President
Laura Brassie Vice President
Chris Varner Treasurer
Sharon Messbarger Board Member
JC Maheu Board Member
Sue Lindsay Board Member
Michele Roads Board Member
Natalie Garza Morrow Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Marla Wasson Artistic Director 20.3% of Rev
Marla Wasson Artistic Director 20.3% of Rev
Deborah Morrow General Manager 16.3% of Rev
Chappell Kingsland Accompanist 9.7% of Rev
Gene Sobczak Executive Director 8.8% of Rev
Chappell Kingsland Accompanist 8.3% of Rev
Deb Morrow Executive Director 8.1% of Rev
Wesley Leffinwell Accompanist 1.8% of Rev
Lisa Griem Board President
Stephanie Lanoue Board President
Susie Battler Secretary
Clinton Bodine Treasurer
Jennifer Sujansky Board Member
JC Maheu Board Member
Stephanie Lanoue Board President
Susie Battler Board President
Theresa Scholtz Secretary
Clint Bodine Treasurer
Linnette Mancuso Board President
Mary ONeill Board Member
Susie Battler Board President
Jennifer Sujansky Board Member
Theresa Scholz Secretary
Kara Sakulich Board Member
Kay McCarthy Treasurer
John Christian Mahheu Board Member
Mary ONeill Board Member
Jennifer Sujansky Board Member
Kara Sakulich Board Member
John Christian Mahheu Board Member
Deborah Morrow General Manager
Marla Wasson Artistic Director
Chappell Kingsland Accompanist
Natalie Morrow Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 64.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.