Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
36
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 10.5% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 — — 4.0% 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 15.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 5.8% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 1.6% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 3.1% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 7.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 8.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Carolyn Mullin Executive Dir. 10.5% of Rev
Gary Davis Board President —
Carol Flores-Beck Board President —
Brandon Wilks Treasurer —
Gary Blum Board Member —
Mike Doty Board Member —
Vincent Stewart Board Member —
Doranda Martin Board Member —
Len Shulman Board Member —
Joy MacKinnon Board Member —
Patrick Mullin Board Member —
Suki Sir Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLYN MULLIN Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
IRMA J LOPEZ Board Member —
GARY BLUM Board President —
VINCENT STEWART Secretary —
CAROL FLORES-BECK Board President —
MIKE DOTY Board Member —
GARY DAVIS Board Member —
LEN SHULMAN Treasurer —
MARIE VILLA Board Member —
DORANDA MARTIN Board Member —
BRANDON WILKS Board Member —
JOY MACKINNON Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAROLYN MULLIN Executive Director 5.9% of Rev
CAROLYN MULLIN Executive Director 4.0% of Rev
IRMA J LOPEZ Board Member —
GARY BLUM Board President —
IRMA J LOPEZ Board President —
VINCENT STEWART Secretary —
GARY BLUM Board President —
CAROL FLORES-BECK Board President —
VINCENT STEWARD Board Member —
MIKE DOTY Board Member —
CARMEN RAMIREZ Board Member —
GARY DAVIS Board Member —
MIKE DOTY Secretary —
LEN SHULMAN Treasurer —
DORANDA MARTIN Board Member —
DORANDA MARTIN Board Member —
LEN SHULMAN Treasurer —
OSCAR GONZALEZ Board Member —
ADAM LOPEZ Board Member —
MANUEL HERRERA Board Member —
BERT PERELLO Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 43 points below the peer median (10 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.