Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
28
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 33.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 25.1% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 30.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 26.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 17.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 26.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 25.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 25.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 30.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 22.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 23.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 25.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 22.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELAINE PHOUTRIDES Board President
LESLIE FITHIAN Board Member
LEEANNE SERA Secretary
SUSAN PROHASKA Board Member
SUSAN BAILEY Board Member
DAYNEE LAI-KRAUSS Treasurer
VIVIAN SAM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAYNEE LAI-KRAUSS Treasurer 28.4% of Rev
ELAINE PHOUTRIDES Board President
LESLIE FITHIAN Board Member
LEEANNE SERA Secretary
SUSAN PROHASKA Board Member
SUSAN BAILEY Board Member
VIVIAN SAM Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAYNEE LAI-KRAUSS Treasurer 31.6% of Rev
ELAINE PHOUTRIDES Board President
LESLIE FITHIAN Board Member
LEEANNE SERA Board Member
SUSAN PROHASKA Board Member
SUSAN BAILEY Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAYNEE LAI-KRAUSS Treasurer 18.5% of Rev
ELAINE PHOUTRIDES Board President
LESLIE FITHIAN Board Member
LEEANNE SERA Board Member
SUSAN PROHASKA Board Member
SUSAN BAILEY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in CA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.