Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 59 Fragile Recovery
2022 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 36 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 60 Stable Stable Watch
2018 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SANGEETA ROY Board President
PURVA SAMANT Treasurer
RICHARD GU Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADRIANA EBERLE Board President
PURVA SAMANT Treasurer
TAWNI ESCUDERO Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ADRIANA EBERLE Board President
SHARON TOBIAS Treasurer
IVA REID Communications
TAWNI ESCUDERO Secretary
BRANDY OLSEN Board President
SHARON TOBIAS Treasurer
LEE TAUBENECK Board Member
YANHONG LIN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.