Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
25
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 16.4% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 19.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 18.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 16.4% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 18.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 13.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 25.7% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 24.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 19.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 22.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 5.3% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 7.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 6.6% 40 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LIHONG ZHANG EXECUTIVE DIR 10.1% of Rev
XIAOLING XU Board Member
MEI JIN Board Member
JENNY WOO Treasurer
JENNIFER FU Board Member
DONGKAI SHANGGUAN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LIHONG ZHANG EXECUTIVE DIR 10.0% of Rev
YANG LI KUNG FU TEACHER 3.3% of Rev
FENG HAN TEACHER 2.5% of Rev
THOMAS TSE FACILITY MGR 1.1% of Rev
JENNY WOO Treasurer 0.7% of Rev
FENG HAN Artistic Director 0.5% of Rev
TIANTIAN LIU MEDIA SPECIALIS 0.4% of Rev
XIAOLING WU Board Member
MEI JIN Board Member
JUSTIN HUANG Board Member
AMY WANG Chairman
CHELSEA GE Office Manager

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FENG HAN TEACHER 10.3% of Rev
LIHONG ZHANG Secretary 7.4% of Rev
YANG LI KUNG FU TEACHER 4.5% of Rev
JENNY WOO Treasurer 3.4% of Rev
XIAOLING XU Board Member
JUSTIN HUANG Board Member
AMY WANG CHAIRWOMAN
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 27 → 25 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.