Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
25
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 36.5% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 44.4% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 19.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 9.6% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 8.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALFREDO AVILA Executive Director
LILIANA CRUZ Board President
PETER XIONG Treasurer
NERAIDIA OLIVA Secretary
OMAR MURILLO Board Member
LUIS AGUIRRE Board Member
ALFREDO AVILA Executive Director
LILIANA CRUZ Board President
PETER XIONG Treasurer
NERAIDIA OLIVA Secretary
OMAR MURILLO Board Member
LUIS AGUIRRE Board Member
ALFREDO AVILA Executive Director
LILIANA CRUZ Board President
PETER XIONG Treasurer
NARAIDIA OLIVA Secretary
OMAR MURILLO Board Member
LUIS AQUIERRE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 23 → 25 over 5 years (improving by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.