Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 39 Fragile Recovery
2012 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PHIL DAHM Board President
BEN COOPER Board President
VIVIAN YU Vice President
WEI WEI PU Treasurer
RAY CHONG Treasurer
YAN QI Secretary
TIANY CHEN Board President
ZHENGHUI XIE Volunteer Coord

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE FULMER-SMENTEK Board President
JIA WO Treasurer
ELIZABETH XIE FUNDRAISING
SANGEETHA SRINIVASAN Secretary
JOHN GILCHRIST TEACHER REP
GRANTIS PERANDA COLOR GUARD REP
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 46 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.