Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 9.9% 48 Fragile Recovery
2022 51 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 11.0% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 8.9% 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 7.8% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 1.4% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 2.1% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 2.3% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 2.5% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 2.3% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 2.9% 49 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 1.5% 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 2.5% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SHAWNA LUCEY Board Member 3.4% of Rev
JAMES WILLIAMS Treasurer 2.7% of Rev
PAIGE SWEETIN Executive Director 2.0% of Rev
KATHRYN PREISSNER Executive Director 1.9% of Rev
CATHY LAZARUS Board President
MICHAEL KALKSTEIN Board President
JANE DECKER Secretary
LAWRENCE KERN Treasurer
PHYLLIS CASCADE BISMANOVSKY Board Member
MIMI CARLSON Board Member
GEORGE CROW Board Member
JANE DECKER Board Member
JULIE EDGCOMB Board Member
CHARLES F HANES Board Member
PROF JOHN HEINEKE Board Member
PEGGY HEIMAN Board Member
JENNIFER AR HSU Board Member
JEANNE MCCANN Board Member
PRAVESH MEHRA Board Member
GILLIAN MORAN Board Member
DR H ANDREA NEVES Board Member
JOYCE SCOTT Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Khori Dastoor Board Member 2.6% of Rev
James D Williams Treasurer 2.3% of Rev
Claire Padien-Havens Board Member 1.9% of Rev
Pravesh Mehra Board Member
Cathy R Lazarus Board Member
George Crow Board Member
Dr Brian Ward Board Member
Dr H Andrea Neves Board Member
Phyllis Bismanovsky Board Member
Jennifer A R Hsu Secretary
Jeanne McCann Board Member
Jane Decker Board Member
NEric Jorgensen Board Member
Julie Edgcomb Board Member
Prof John Heineke Board Member
Peggy Heiman Board Member
Charles Hanes Treasurer
Michael H Kalkstein Board Member
Larry Kern Board Member
Gillian Moran Board President
Mimi Carlson Board Member
Vijay Vaidyanathan Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Aaron Nicholson Board Member 2.2% of Rev
Larry Hancock Board Member 1.5% of Rev
James Williams Treasurer 1.0% of Rev
Khori Dastoor Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Michael Kalkstein Board Member
Charles Hanes Treasurer
Marilyn Sefchovich Board Member
Melody Walsh Board Member
Gillian Moran Board President
Mimi Carlson Board Member
Peggy Heiman Vice President
Vijay Vaidyanathan Board Member
Laurie Warner Vice President
Gerard Seelig Vice President
Frank Fiscalini Board Member
Dr Brian Ward Vice President
Dr H Andrea Neves Vice President
Phyllis Bismanovsky Board Member
Jennifer A R Hsu Secretary
Jeanne McCann Vice President
Jane Decker Board Member
NEric Jorgensen Gen Counsel
William R Lambert Board Member
Richard Dorsay MD PhD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.