Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 10.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — 13.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 5.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 0.3% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK JOHANSSON Treasurer —
GEORGE BISHOP Board Member —
FRANCISCO J IZAGUIRRE Board President —
DON CLARKE GUILD LIASON —
EIKI ISOMURA Artistic Director —
KIRK HICKEY GUILD REPRESENTATIVE —
MARK JOHANNSON Board Member —
LAWRENCE GETTLEMAN SECRETERY —
KATHRYN FRADY Artistic Director —
WENDY BERGIN ORCHESTRA REPRESENTATIVE —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILSON DARBY Treasurer —
GEORGE BISHOP Board Member —
ELISE BUNGO Board President —
DON CLARKE GUILD LIASON —
ANDRIA BALOGH RICE BOARD FELLOW —
EIKI ISOMURA Artistic Director —
PAUL MARSDEN Board Member —
FRANCISCO JAVIER IZAQUIRRE Board Member —
MARK JOHANNSON Board Member —
LAWRENCE GETTLEMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILSON DARBY Treasurer —
DAN MATHENA Board Member —
GEORGE BISHOP Board Member —
ELISE BUNGO Board President —
DON CLARKE GUILD LIASON —
ANDRIA BALOGH RICE BOARD FELLOW —
EIKI ISOMURA Artistic Director —
PAUL MARSDEN Board Member —
FRANCISCO JAVIER IZAQUIRRE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EIKI ISOMURA Artistic Director 6.5% of Rev
PAIGE MYRICK Executive Director 2.5% of Rev
WILSON DARBY Treasurer —
DAN MATHENA Board Member —
GEORGE BISHOP Board Member —
ELISE BUNGO Board President —
ROSINA CHEVALIER GUILD LIASON —
ANDRIA BALOGH RICE BOARD FELLOW —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EIKI ISOMURA Artistic Director 6.4% of Rev
PAIGE MYRICK Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
WILSON DARBY Treasurer —
BRIAN MCCULLON Board Member —
SANDRA TIREY SECRETERY —
DAN MATHENA CHAIRMAN —
GEORGE BISHOP Board Member —
ELISE BUNGO Board Member —
ROSINA CHEVALIER GUILD LIASON —
ANDRIA BALOGH RICE BOARD FELLOW —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 483 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (25 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.