Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 57 Fragile Recovery
2022 32.5% 58 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 47 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICK FLICK Executive Director 45.5% of Rev
AARON YOUNG AT-LARGE
GUY ROBERTS AT-LARGE
JASON KING JONES AT-LARGE
VANESSA MOROSCO AT-LARGE
KAREN ANN DANIELS AT-LARGE
SCOTT JACKSON Board President
JENNI STEWART Treasurer
KATI GRACE KIRBY Secretary
REBECCA GOODHEART Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICK FLICK Executive Director 35.5% of Rev
KATI GRACE KIRBY AT-LARGE
SHERRI YOUNG AT-LARGE
CARLOS DROCCHI AT-LARGE
RAPHAEL MASSIE AT-LARGE
REBECCA GOODHEART AT-LARGE
SCOTT JACKSON Board President
VIETCA DO PROGRAMS MANAGER
AARON YOUNG Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICK FLICK EXECUTIVE DI 24.7% of Rev
IAN GALLANAR Board President
SARAH ENLOE VICE PRESIDE
JENNI STEWART Treasurer
BRIAN CROWE Secretary
DEBRA ANN BOYD AT-LARGE
JESSICA BOONE AT-LARGE
CLARK NICHOLSON AT-LARGE
RAPHAEL PARRY AT-LARGE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (80 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.