Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 16.2% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 22.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 24.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 24.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 14.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 19.0% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 12.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 14.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NANCY ARIZA Board Member
VALERIE HOINESS Board Member
MELISSA STAUDINGER Board Member
KATHLEEN KVERN Board Member
SUSAN HAUGEN Treasurer
AMANDA KALER Secretary
CHRISTOPHER HARRISON Board Member
HEIDI SCHUSTER Board President
PETER SEGAR Board President
RYAN SWEENEY Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HEATHER DOYLE Artistic Director 9.0% of Rev
VICTORIA LAUING Executive Director 9.0% of Rev
JHYLE RINKER Board Member 2.3% of Rev
BECCA CERRA Board Member 1.7% of Rev
ROGER KARLSON Board Member 1.3% of Rev
KATHLEEN KVERN Board Member
SUSAN HAUGEN Treasurer
VALERIE HOINESS Secretary
CHRISTOPHER HARRISON Board Member
HEIDI SCHUSTER Board Member
PETER SEGAR Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Doyle Artistic Director 7.7% of Rev
Victoria Lauing Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
Jhyle Rinker Board Member 1.5% of Rev
Susan Haugen Board President
Valerie Hoiness Secretary
Becca Cerra Board Member
Roger Karlson Board Member
Pete Segar Board Member
Christopher Harrison Board Member
Heidi Schuster Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Doyle Artistic Director 6.9% of Rev
Victoria Lauing Executive Director 5.7% of Rev
Jhyle Rinker Board Member 1.4% of Rev
Roger Karlson Board Member 0.3% of Rev
Susan Haugen Board President
Valerie Hoiness Secretary
Christopher Harrison Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 7 other orgs in MN with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.