Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 12.2% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 11.1% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 9.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 14.3% 40 Fragile Recovery
2019 9.2% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 7.0% 44 Fragile Recovery
2017 13.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 18.3% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 17.4% 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 20.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 23.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 8.8% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 25.9% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIM LONG Executive Director 12.3% of Rev
ERIC CANALES Board President
JULIENNE GREER Secretary
LEWIS SCHWARTZ Treasurer
LAUREN ALBRECHT Board Member
SHARON GREENSTONE Board Member
ASHLEIGH HERRON Board Member
KRISTEN MCCURDY Board Member
AMETHYST SLOANE Board Member
BRUCE WEINER Board Member
JEREMY DAVIS Board Member
BLAKE LENZ Board Member
LANA HOOVER Board Member
TAYLOR STANIFORTH Board Member
ASHLEY WHITE Board Member
DANIEL MARDONES Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIM LONG Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
BARBARA WYATT Board President
ASHLEIGH HERRON Board President
SHEY THOMPSON Secretary
LAUREN ALBRECHT Board Member
ERIC CANALES Board Member
SHARON GREENSTONE Board Member
JUSTON HOLT Board Member
SCOTT KIRK Board Member
KRISTEN MCCURDY Board Member
BRUCE WEINER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIM LONG Executive Director 10.4% of Rev
CATHERINE RUDE Board President
SCOTT KIRK Board President
SHEY THOMPSON Secretary
KAWANA MOORE Treasurer
LAUREN ALBRECHT Board Member
ERIC CANALES Board Member
ALEX CANALES Board Member
SHARON GREENSTONE Board Member
ASHLEIGH HERRON Board Member
JUSTON HOLT Board Member
KAREN KIRK Board Member
SCOTT KIRK Board Member
KRISTEN MCCURDY Board Member
MONTY PHILLIPS Board Member
BRUCE WEINER Board Member
BARBARA WYATT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 133 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.