Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
32
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 9.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 10.8% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 24.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 23.3% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 16.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 14.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 11.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 9.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 12.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 12.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 5.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 7.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 10.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Airanne P Marcee Executive Director 7.7% of Rev
Justin Lucero Board Member 2.4% of Rev
Mariana Sandoval Office & Social Media Manager 2.4% of Rev
Sondra Santella Board Member —
Jay Stratton Board Member —
Kimberly Wolfenbarger-Nakamoto Board Member —
Omar Rodriguez Board Member —
Robert Holguin Board Member —
Adrian Ordonez Board Member —
Michael White Treasurer —
Chelsea Lamego Board President —
Andrea Spier Secretary —
Marcela Flores Fernandez Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Arianne P Marcee Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Mariana Sandoval Office & Social Media Manager 2.6% of Rev
Justin Lucero Board Member 2.3% of Rev
Jay Stratton Board Member —
Sondra Santaella Board Member —
Stacy Hunter Spier Board President —
Kimberly Wolfenbarger-Nakamoto Board Member —
Robert Holguin Board Member —
Adrian Ordonez Board Member —
Omar Rodriquez Board Member —
Michael White Treasurer —
Chelsea Lamego Board President —
Andrea Spier Secretary —
Marcela Flores Fernandez Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ARIANNE P MARCEE Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
MARIANA SANDOVAL OFFICE & SOCIAL MEDIA MANA 2.7% of Rev
JUSTIN LUCERO Board Member 2.4% of Rev
MICHAEL WHITE Treasurer —
STACY HUNT SPIER Board President —
GEORGE DE LA TORRE Board Member —
CHELSEA LAMEGO Board Member —
ELISA SAMANIEGO Board Member —
JAMES STRATTON Board Member —
KIMBERLEY WOLFENBARGER-NAKAMOTO Board Member —
MARECELA FLORES FERNANDEZ Board Member —
OMAR RODRIGUEZ Board Member —
ANDREA SPIER Secretary —
KELLIE RUMBA -RATTAY Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 483 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 67 points below the peer median (0 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 24 → 32 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.