Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 23.1% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 6.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 24.3% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROLINA CARTER Board Member 18.2% of Rev
JUDITH BERGQUIST Secretary
LESLIE BITGOOD Board Member
DOROTHY LESSEM Board President
KRISTI CZAJKOWSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ROLINA CARTER Board Member 5.2% of Rev
JUDITH BERGQUIST Secretary
LESLIE BITGOOD Board Member
TONY QUARANTA VICE PRESIDE
DOROTHY LESSEM Board President
KRISTI CZAJKOWSKI Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNETTE SAPP GALLERY MANA 13.3% of Rev
CHARLES CASPER Board Member 2.6% of Rev
ROBYN ANNE COCHRAN-RAGLAND Board Member 1.5% of Rev
KRISTI CZAJKOWSKI Board Member
LESLIE BITGOOD MEMBERSHIP C
ROLINA CARTER VICE PRESIDE
DOROTHY LESSEM Board President
WARNER REESER Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 183 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (75 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.