Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 51 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | 23.1% | 39 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2021 | — | — | 6.3% | 50 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2020 | — | — | 24.3% | 47 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROLINA CARTER | Board Member | 18.2% of Rev | ||
| JUDITH BERGQUIST | Secretary | — | ||
| LESLIE BITGOOD | Board Member | — | ||
| DOROTHY LESSEM | Board President | — | ||
| KRISTI CZAJKOWSKI | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROLINA CARTER | Board Member | 5.2% of Rev | ||
| JUDITH BERGQUIST | Secretary | — | ||
| LESLIE BITGOOD | Board Member | — | ||
| TONY QUARANTA | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| DOROTHY LESSEM | Board President | — | ||
| KRISTI CZAJKOWSKI | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANNETTE SAPP | GALLERY MANA | 13.3% of Rev | ||
| CHARLES CASPER | Board Member | 2.6% of Rev | ||
| ROBYN ANNE COCHRAN-RAGLAND | Board Member | 1.5% of Rev | ||
| KRISTI CZAJKOWSKI | Board Member | — | ||
| LESLIE BITGOOD | MEMBERSHIP C | — | ||
| ROLINA CARTER | VICE PRESIDE | — | ||
| DOROTHY LESSEM | Board President | — | ||
| WARNER REESER | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 183 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (75 vs. 36).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 55 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).
What's driving this score
- No individual risk drivers stand out. Overall score reflects component balance, not any single signal.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.