Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 11.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 — — 14.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 13.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 13.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 12.0% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 11.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 11.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 15.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 5.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 10.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 12.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 7.4% 40 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 5.5% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATTY NEUWIRTH EXECUTIVE DI 11.7% of Rev
DAVID JACKSON Board President —
DORIS LAMBERT VICE PRESIDE —
LINDA CHAPMAN Secretary —
JO ANN KNECHT Treasurer —
MELISSA BECK Board Member —
PAM BRISOLARA Board Member —
DOUG BROWN Board Member —
TANYA CASE Board Member —
TIM DILEY Board Member —
BLAKE DUTCHER Board Member —
JANICE FRITSCH Board Member —
CAROL GARDNER Board Member —
KATHRYN HICKMAN Board Member —
JIM LAMBERT Board Member —
PIERE MARIANO Board Member —
RONDA NORRELL Board Member —
CINDY O'CONNOR Board Member —
CONNER SASSEEN Board Member —
SALLY SIMPSON Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATTY NEUWIRTH EXECUTIVE DI 11.7% of Rev
MELISSA BECK Board Member —
SHAUN CALIX Board Member —
TANYA CASE Board Member —
LINDA CHAPMAN Secretary —
TIM DILEY Board Member —
BLAKE DUTCHER Board Member —
JANICE FRITSCH Board Member —
CAROL GARDNER Board Member —
KATHRYN HICKMAN Board Member —
DAVID JACKSON Board President —
MARTIN JOHNSTON Board Member —
JO ANN KNECHT Treasurer —
DORIS LAMBERT VICE PRESIDE —
JIM LAMBERT Board Member —
PIERE MARIANO Board Member —
RONDA NORRELL Board Member —
CINDY O'CONNOR Board Member —
SALLY SIMPSON Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATTY NEUWIRTH EXECUTIVE DI 11.1% of Rev
MELISSA BECK Board Member —
SHAUN CALIX Board Member —
TANYA CASE Board Member —
LINDA CHAPMAN Secretary —
BARBARA CURRY Board Member —
BLAKE DUTCHER Board Member —
CAROL GARDNER Board Member —
KATHRYN HICKMAN Board Member —
DAVID JACKSON Board President —
MARTIN JOHNSTON Board Member —
REBECCA KINSLOW Board Member —
JO ANN KNECHT Treasurer —
DORIS LAMBERT VICE PRESIDE —
JIM LAMBERT Board Member —
PIERE MARIANO Board Member —
BARBARA MOELLER Board Member —
ROBERT MUNOZ Board Member —
RONDA NORRELL Board Member —
CINDY O'CONNOR Board Member —
SALLY SIMPSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 95 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 49 points below the peer median (0 vs. 49).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.