Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 8.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 4.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 6.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 5.5% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 6.4% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Katlin McCauley Studio Manager 7.1% of Rev
Charna Lopez Artistic Director
Elise Lamm Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Katlin McCauley Studio Manager 5.5% of Rev
Charna Lopez Artistic Director
Elise Lamm Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charna Lopez Artistic Director
Elise Lamm Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Charna Lopez Artistic Director
Elise Lamm Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.