Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 16.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 16.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 10.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 15.0% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 14.3% 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 15.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 8.7% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 13.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 7.0% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 11.8% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 14.3% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 12.8% 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 10.0% 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Matthew Anderson Board Member
Marjorie Atwood Board Member
Jon Fisher Parliamentarian
Barbara Gabel Board Member
Farooq Karim Board Member
Kathryn Kenney Board Member
Jacquelyn Knapp Board Member
Drew Knox Board Member
Kyle Larson Board Member
Heather Lunsford Board Member
John Marshall Board President
Kirsten Olds Board President
Diane Salamon Treasurer
Douglas Sorocco Board President
Russ Yeubner Board Member
Christopher Winland Board Member
Ricco Wright Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Krystle D Kaye Executive Director 12.2% of Rev
Susan Agee Board Member
Marjorie Atwood Board Member
Bob Curtis Board Member
Jon Fisher Parliamentarian
Barbara Gabel Board Member
Anna Inhofe Board Member
Farooq Karim Board Member
Kathryn Kenney Board Member
Drew Knox Board Member
Kyle Larson Board Member
Heather Lunsford Board Member
John Marshall Board President
Laura Massenat Board Member
Kirsten Olds Board Member
Chris Sker Rogers Board Member
Diane Salamon Treasurer
Douglas Sorocco Board President
Chris Winland Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Krystle D Kaye Executive Director 11.0% of Rev
Susan Agee Board Member
Marjorie Atwood Board Member
Bob Curtis Board Member
Gina Ellis Board Member
Jon Fisher Board Member
Barbara Gabel Board Member
Saiyada Garezi Treasurer
Susan Green Board President
Drew Knox Board Member
Kyle Larson Board Member
John Marshall Board President
Travis Mason Board Member
Kirsten Olds Board Member
Laura Massenat Board Member
Diane Salamon Secretary
Douglas Sorocco Board President
Chris Winland Board Member
Dean Wyatt Board Member
Jake Yunker Parlimentarian
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 13 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 38 points above the peer median (60 vs. 22).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.