Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 17.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 21.4% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 22.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 19.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 19.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 17.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTINE MARKES EXECUTIVE DI 17.6% of Rev
JOSE BATTY Secretary
DR MARK G BELCIK Board Member
CHRISTINA BERG Board Member
CHRIS BISHOP Board Member
BETH BOREN Treasurer
MATTHEW CRAIG Board Member
JEANNE JACKSON Board Member
JAKE JOHNSON Board Member
RACHEL POE Board Member
ERIN RIPKA Board Member
JOE RODANO IMMEDIATE PA
CHAZLEN ROOK Board Member
ULISES SERRANO Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTINE MARKES EXECUTIVE DI 17.9% of Rev
JOSE BATTY Secretary
DR MARK G BELCIK Board Member
CHRISTINE BERG Board Member
BETH BOREN Treasurer
KIM FLETCHER Board Member
MARK PARKER Board Member
CATHY REAVES Board Member
JOE RODANO Board President
CHAZLEN ROOK Board Member
ULISES SERRANO Board Member
JOSEPH THAI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELODY GARZA PRIOR EX DIR 11.8% of Rev
KRIS MARKES CURRENT EXEC 5.3% of Rev
JOSE BATTY Secretary
DR MARK G BELCIK Board Member
ALEXIS CARTER BLACK Board President
BETH BOREN Board Member
KIM FLETCHER Board Member
PAUL HAGEMEIER Board President
MARK PARKER Board Member
CATHY REAVES Board Member
JOE RODANO Treasurer
CHAZLEN ROOK Board Member
JOSEPH THAI Board Member
NATHAN YOUNG Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELODY GARZA PRIOR EX DIR 15.7% of Rev
JOSE BATTY Board Member
DR MARK G BELCIK Board Member
ALEXIS CARTER BLACK Board President
KIM FLETCHER Board Member
PAUL HAGEMEIER PAST CHAIRMA
PEGGY KAHRE Board Member
KRIS MARKES CURRENT EXEC
DEAN MARK PARKER Board Member
CATHY REAVES Board Member
JOE RODANO Board Member
JOSEPH THAI Board Member
NATHAN YOUNG Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELODY GARZA EXECUTIVE DI 15.5% of Rev
DR MARK G BELCIK Board Member
ALEXIS CARTER-BLACK Board President
KIM FLETCHER Board Member
PAUL HAGEMEIER PAST CHAIRMA
PEGGY KAHRE Board Member
KRIS MARKES Secretary
DEAN MARK PARKER Board Member
JOSEPH THAI Board Member
NATHAN YOUNG Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 66 other orgs in OK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points below the peer median (15 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.