Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

"Presents compelling contemporary operas with high musical and dramatic standards, integrating modern aesthetics, technology, and social relevance, while engaging diverse communities through educational programs and focusing on rights and equity in the opera field."

— Statement of Program Service Accomplishments

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 4.3% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 21.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 10.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 12.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 11.2% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 6.1% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 12.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 11.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 18.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 5.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Nott Executive Director 4.3% of Rev
Tony Shayne Board Member —
Jerome Roth Board President —
Peggy Otum Board President —
Lisa Lindelef Secretary —
Jane Hartley Treasurer —
Malekeh Amini Board Member —
Dr Melinda Luisa de Jesus Board Member —
Marylene Delbourg Delphis Board Member —
Louise Fox Board Member —
Marcia Lazer Board Member —
Steven Lei Board Member —
Kip Cranna Board Member —
Jeff Mattlin Board Member —
Jee Young You Board Member —
Simin Naaseh Board Member —
Jo Giessler Board Member —
Nancy Petrisko Board Member —
John Roevekamp Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Nott Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
Aileen Tat Development Dir 3.4% of Rev
Jane Hartley Treasurer —
Clifford Kip Cranna Board Member —
Dr Melinda Luisa de Jesus Board Member —
Marylene Delbourg Delphis Board Member —
Louise Fox Board Member —
Marcia Lazer Board Member —
Steven Lei Board Member —
Lisa Lindelef Board Member —
Bernice Lindstrom Board Member —
Carmelita Mitchell Board Member —
Simin Naaseh Board Member —
Alan Olejniczak Board Member —
Peggy Otum Board Member —
Nancy Petrisko Board Member —
John Roevekamp Board Member —
Jerome Roth Board President —
Deb Stallings Board President —
Margie O'Driscoll Secretary —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Nott Executive Director 2.4% of Rev
Debbie Chinn Executive Director 0.7% of Rev
Deb Stallings Board President —
Jerome C Roth Board President —
Jane Hartley Treasurer —
Margie ODriscoll Secretary —
Clifford Cranna PhD Board Member —
Dr Melinda Luisa de Jess Board Member —
Marylene Delbourg-Delphis Board Member —
Marcia Lazer Board Member —
Lisa Lindelef Board Member —
Bernice Lindstrom Board Member —
Simin Naaseh Board Member —
Alan Olejniczak Board Member —
Peggy Otum Board Member —
Nancy Petrisko Board Member —
John Roevekamp Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Debbie Chinn Board Member 4.0% of Rev
Debbie Chinn Executive Dir. 3.7% of Rev
Nancy Petrisko Board President —
Didi Boring Board President —
Jaisette Herrera Treasurer —
Marcia Lazer Secretary —
Charles Charnas Board Member —
Jerome C Roth Board Member —
Marylene Delbourg-Delphis Board Member —
Jane Hartly Board Member —
Lisa Lindelef Board Member —
Bernice Lindstrom Board Member —
Parker Monroe Board Member —
Simin Naaseh Board Member —
Alan Olejniczak Board Member —
Ruth Nott Executive Director —
Jerome C Roth Board President —
Didi Boring Board President —
Philip Goward Treasurer —
Marcia Lazer Secretary —
Charles Charnas Board Member —
Marylene Delbourg-Delphis Board Member —
Jane Hartly Board Member —
Jaisette Herrera Board Member —
Bernice Lindstrom Board Member —
Parker Monroe Board Member —
Simin Naaseh Board Member —
Nancy Petrisko Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.