Mission Drift
What does this mean?
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
The Path Forward
The Lodestar
A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 52 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 55 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | 27.1% | 42 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | 13.1% | 52 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | 20.5% | 34 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2018 | — | — | 50.3% | 27 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | 17.9% | 47 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | 25.9% | 32 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2015 | — | — | 22.4% | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 37 | Financially Distressed | Decline Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Danger Rosenthal | Board Member | — | ||
| Fatema Crane | Board Member | — | ||
| Graham Gockley | Treasurer | — | ||
| Hillary Bray | Fundraising Ch | — | ||
| Sarah Williams | Vice President | — | ||
| Steve Collier | Board Member | — | ||
| Daniel Cai | Board Member | — | ||
| Nisha Singh | Board Member | — | ||
| Katharine Forbes | Board Member | — | ||
| Karina Gutierrez | Board President | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emily Danger Rosenthal | Board President | — | ||
| Fatema Crane | Secretary | — | ||
| Graham Gockley | Treasurer | — | ||
| Hillary Bray | Board Member | — | ||
| Sarah Williams | Board Member | — | ||
| Steve Collier | Board Member | — | ||
| Kerstin Firmin | Board Member | — | ||
| Kaili Hwang | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mina Morita | Artistic Director | 4.9% of Rev | ||
| Bethany Herron | Board Member | 4.9% of Rev | ||
| Emily Danger Rosenthal | Board President | — | ||
| Fatema Crane | Secretary | — | ||
| Graham Gockley | Treasurer | — | ||
| Hillary Bray | Board Member | — | ||
| Jennifer Brody | Board Member | — | ||
| Steve Collier | Board Member | — | ||
| Kerstin Firmin | Board Member | — | ||
| Kaili Hwang | Board Member | — | ||
| Celine Parrenas Shimizu | Board Member | — | ||
| Sarah Williams | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Mission Drift
Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.