Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 55 Fragile Recovery
2019 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 52 Fragile Recovery
2017 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE BRIDGEFORTH Board President
TROY DEBILL Board President
TOM RICHARD Secretary
DR IRY RICE Treasurer
WENDY TALBOT Board Member
DR CELESTE ALEXANDER Board Member
DR KAREN DEJARNETTE Board Member
TOM BENNETT Board Member
JAMES ANDREW MINCY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE BRIDGEFORTH Board Member
MARTIN CARTY CHAIRMAN
TROY DEBILL PAST BOARD C
CHARLOTTE ENGLAND VICE PRESIDE
SARAH FISHER ASC BOARD CH
JODIE JOLLY Treasurer
ANNETTE KLINE Board Member
FREDDYE PEATTE Board Member
DAVID RAINEY Board Member
BECKY SIMPSON Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 5 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 19 points above the peer median (45 vs. 26).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 49 → 49 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.