Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
32
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — 8.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 19.7% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 10.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 17.2% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 14.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ED MCCLURE Artistic Director —
JOE MARCH Treasurer —
RON SASINE Board President —
JIM LEFEVRE Board President —
DEBBIE ALSUP Secretary —
ALIX BARRETT Board Member —
RUSTY TURNER Board President —
AMY JOHNSON Board Member —
AMY HARRIS Board Member —
FARRIS BERGANT Board Member —
SOL KIM Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ED MCCLURE Artistic Director 0.2% of Rev
JOE MARCH Treasurer —
RON SASINE Board President —
JIM LEFEVRE Board President —
DEBBIE ALSUP Secretary —
ALIX BARRETT Board Member —
RUSTY TURNER Board President —
AMY JOHNSON Board President —
AMY HARRIS Board President —
FARRIS BERGANT Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH FARMER Executive Director 9.0% of Rev
ED MCCLURE Artistic Director —
JOE MARCH Treasurer —
RON SASINE Board President —
JEFF DUNN Board President —
SHEY BLAND Secretary —
DAVID GAY Board Member —
MILLE DAVIS ALDERMAN Board President —
JIM LEFEVRE Board President —
DEBBIE ALSUP Board Member —
KRIS ISHAM Board President —
RON HAYES Board Member —
SAMANTHA HERRERA Board Member —
CONNIE JONES Board Member —
JENELLA SHELTON Board Member —
ALIX BARRETT Board Member —
BROCK SHOWALTER Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSEPH FARMER Executive Director 13.7% of Rev
ED MCCLURE Artistic Director —
JOE MARCH Treasurer —
RON SASINE Board President —
JEFF DUNN Board President —
SHEY BLAND Secretary —
DAVID GAY Board Member —
MILLE DAVIS ALDERMAN Board President —
JIM LEFEVRE Board President —
DEBBIE ALSUP Board Member —
KRIS ISHAM Board President —
RON HAYES Board Member —
KATIE SCHIFANO Board Member —
SAMANTHA HERRERA Board Member —
CONNIE JONES Board Member —
JENELLA SHELTON Board Member —
ALIX BARRETT Board Member —
BROCK SHOWALTER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 44 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (0 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.