Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation ↑
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 6.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2023 — — 4.5% 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 4.5% 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 11.8% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — 13.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 12.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABBY JENNINGS Board Member —
ERIN RUSSELL Board Member —
DEBBIE DAVIS Board Member —
LISA BRUMLEY-HANEY Board Member —
RACHELLE MAASS Board Member —
CHARLIE MOULTON Board Member —
ELIZABETH IRBY Board Member —
SARAH MATHEWS Board Member —
CATHERINE FOTHERGILL EXECUTIVE DI —
ANN PATEL Board President —
ALAN BAGLEY VICE PRESIDE —
AMANDA O'NEAL Secretary —
DR ANDY TERRY Treasurer —
MEGAN HALL VICE TREASUR —
DR AMY GALDAMEZ Board Member —
CHRISTOPHER DOUGLAS JOHNSON Board Member —
ROSS OWYOUNG Board Member —
SUZANNE BABBIE Board Member —
JULIE ROBINSON Board Member —
ELIZABETH MICHAEL Board Member —
MONICA LO Board Member —
ANGELA ROWE Board Member —
ROBERT O'NEAL Board Member —
MICHAL HARRIS Board Member —
STACEY SEBREE Board Member —
JUSTIN BANK Board Member —
MATTHEW SEWELL Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR ANDY TERRY Treasurer —
ELIESE FREEMAN-CRUMLEY Board Member —
DR AMY GALDAMEZ Board Member —
ROSS OWYOUNG Board Member —
AMBER BAGLEY Board Member —
ALAN BAGLEY VICE PRESIDE —
CHRIS JOHNSON Board Member —
JULIE ROBINSON Board Member —
ANN PATEL Board President —
MEGAN HALL Secretary —
BEC DWYER-COOP Board Member —
SUZANNE BABBIE Board Member —
ELIZABETH MICHAEL Board Member —
JUSTIN BANK Board Member —
AMANDA O'NEAL Board Member —
ROBERT O'NEAL Board Member —
ERIN RUSSELL Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WENDY SEE Board Member —
DR ANDY TERRY Treasurer —
KATHRYN BROOKS GORNATTI VICE PRESIDE —
BETTY HARRISON Board Member —
DRAKE MANN Board Member —
SARAH PILCHER Board Member —
PATRICIA FARNSWORTH Board President —
JENNIE STRANGE Board Member —
JEANNE ANSON Secretary —
ELIESE FREEMAN-CRUMLEY Board Member —
DR DANNY FLETCHER Board Member —
DR AMY GALDAMEZ Board Member —
ROSS OWYOUNG Board Member —
BRIDGETTE FRAZIER Board Member —
STACY BELL Board Member —
CHRIS JOHNSON Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 44 other orgs in AR with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points above the peer median (60 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.