Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 10.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 15.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 13.7% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 8.4% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 5.1% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 9.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2017 6.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 6.5% 48 Fragile Recovery
2015 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 6.9% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 7.1% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 5.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 5.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2010 6.8% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LAURIE PETERSON Board President 5.1% of Rev
PAULA DUPRE PESMEN Executive Director 3.1% of Rev
VANESSA PETERSON Board Member 2.5% of Rev
STEPHEN WEBSTER Board President
JOHN MARLOW Board President
KIRSTEN HECKENDORF Secretary
RUCHI BRUNVAND Treasurer
JACQUELINE VAN SOMEREN Treasurer
GEOFFREY HANSEN Board Member
PAM BERNAL Board Member
SHERI BERNAL Board Member
JODY MATHIE MD Board Member
JOHN GORMAN Board Member
HOLLIE SEELEY Board Member
MICHAEL BARNATHAN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WILLIAM HENRY PENNINGTON Board President 4.3% of Rev
PAULA DUPRE PESMEN Executive Director 3.5% of Rev
DANA BACARDI Board President 3.4% of Rev
MARY BETH APPEL Board President 3.2% of Rev
PHILLIP SMITH Board President 3.1% of Rev
AMY CARPENTER Board President
STEPHEN WEBSTER Board President
KIRSTEN HECKENDORF Secretary
GEOFFREY HANSEN Board Member
PAM BERNAL Board Member
SHERI BERNAL Board Member
JOHN MARLOW Board Member
JODY MATHIE MD Board Member
ANNE TRUJILLO Board Member
JACQUELINE VAN SOMEREN Treasurer
MICHAEL BARNATHAN Board Member
RUCHI BRUNVAND Board Member
RWENSHAUN MILLER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANA BACARDI Board President 4.0% of Rev
PAULA DUPRE PESMEN Executive Director 3.8% of Rev
MARY BETH APPEL Board President 3.4% of Rev
AMY CARPENTER Board President
STEPHEN WEBSTER Board President
KIRSTEN HECKENDORF Secretary
GEOFFREY HANSEN Board Member
PAM BERNAL Board Member
SHERI BERNAL Board Member
JOHN MARLOW Board Member
JODY MATHIE MD Board Member
ANNE TRUJILLO Board Member
JACQUELINE VAN SOMEREN Treasurer
MICHAEL BARNATHAN Board Member
RUCHI BRUNVAND Board Member
RWENSHAUN MILLER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANA BACARDI Board President 4.1% of Rev
PAULA DUPRE PESMEN Executive Director 3.2% of Rev
AMY CARPENTER Board President
PAM BERNAL Board President
STEPHEN WEBSTER Secretary
GEOFFREY HANSEN Board Member
KIRSTEN HECKENDORF Board Member
SHERI BERNAL Board Member
JOHN MARLOW Board Member
JODY MATHIE MD Board Member
ANNE TRUJILLO Board Member
JACQUELINE VAN SOMEREN Treasurer
MICHAEL BARNATHAN Board Member
RUCHI BRUNVAND Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 12,662 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix P2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.