Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 47 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 45 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 40 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 64 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 65 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 53 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYNDY SOBEL | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHELE CHAPMAN | Secretary | — | ||
| CYNTHIA FORBES | Board Member | — | ||
| BECKY VREELAND | Board President | — | ||
| BARBARA CLARK | Board Member | — | ||
| DOUG CEMBELLIN | Board Member | — | ||
| EMIL ROESSINGH | Board Member | — | ||
| GARY DEAS | Board Member | — | ||
| LARRY RICHARDSON | Board President | — | ||
| TIM BARNES | Board Member | — | ||
| MARIE SCHRADER | Treasurer | — |
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYNDY SOBEL | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHELE CHAPMAN | Secretary | — | ||
| CYNTHIA FORBES | Board Member | — | ||
| BARBARA CLARK | Board Member | — | ||
| CHARISE REYNOLDS | Board Member | — | ||
| KURT COMBS | Board President | — | ||
| LARRY RICHARDSON | Board President | — | ||
| JO FAY | Board Member | — | ||
| MARIE SCHRADER | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 64 → 47 over 5 years (declining by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
- Two consecutive years of deficit spending.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.