Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 10.2% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 5.8% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 16.5% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mary Jensen Thackery Artistic Director 8.4% of Rev
Mary Jensen Thackery Artistic Director 8.4% of Rev
Barbara Burkett Board President
Cindy Crounse Board President
Alison Rice Treasurer
Laney Poye Secretary
Barbara Burkett Board President
Cindy Crounse Board President
Alison Rice Treasurer
Laney Poye Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Kimberly Alexander Graf Office Manager 31.4% of Rev
Mary Jensen Thackery Artistic Director 9.2% of Rev
Barbara Burkett Board President
Cindy Crounse Board President
Alison Rice Treasurer
Laney Poye Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 39 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.