Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 5.0% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 2.9% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 6.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 18.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 4.6% 49 Fragile Recovery
2018 4.7% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 4.7% 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 3.1% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 6.0% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 6.6% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 6.2% 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 6.6% 40 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 6.3% 40 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Wainacht Board Member 4.7% of Rev
Rebecca Lutt Board President
Ellen Winograd Board President
Greg Johns Treasurer
Cheryl Yee Glass Secretary
Angela DeBarger Board Member
Farron Ezakovich Board Member
David Golden Board Member
Jess Hazlett Board Member
Susanna Hovland Board Member
Robert Jacobs Board Member
Casey Jones Board Member
Arthur Lawyer Board Member
Amanda von Moos Board Member
Colby Wiley Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Wainacht Board Member 3.2% of Rev
Bruce Lowry Board President
Ellen Winograd Board President
Greg Johns Treasurer
Cheryl Yee Glass Secretary
Tamara Arroyo Board Member
Farron Ezakovich Board Member
David Golden Board Member
Jess Hazlett Board Member
Susy Hovland Board Member
Marc Hudock Board Member
Robert Jacobs Board Member
Casey Jones Board Member
Colby Lavin Board Member
Arthur Lawyer Board Member
William R Lutt Board Member
Rebecca Lutt Board Member
Emerson Urry Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Wainacht Board Member 4.1% of Rev
Bruce Lowry Board President
Ellen Winograd Board President
Greg Johns Treasurer
Cheryl Yee Glass Secretary
Susan Ansberry Board Member
Tamara Arroyo Board Member
Leslie Blackie Board Member
Farron Ezakovich Board Member
David Golden Board Member
Marc Hudock Board Member
Robert Jacobs Board Member
Casey Jones Board Member
Colby Lavin Board Member
Arthur Lawyer Board Member
Beth Lutt Board Member
William R Lutt Board Member
Rebecca Lutt Pournoor Board Member
Emerson Urry Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Emily Wainacht Board Member 4.3% of Rev
Bruce Lowry Board President
Ellen Winograd Board President
Greg Johns Treasurer
Leslie Blackie Secretary
Susan Ansberry Board Member
Tamara Arroyo Board Member
Farron Ezakovich Board Member
Cheryl Yee Glass Board Member
David Golden Board Member
Mac Hudock Board Member
Colby Lavin Board Member
Arthur Lawyer Board Member
Beth Lutt Board Member
William R Lutt Board Member
Rebecca Lutt Pournoor Board Member
Emerson Urry Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 870 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix N2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.