Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 13.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 12.8% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 12.9% 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 9.7% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 6.5% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 8.3% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — 6.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 7.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 6.7% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — 4.6% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 4.9% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Richard Lonsdorf Executive Dir. 9.3% of Rev
Jenny Chisholm Treasurer 4.3% of Rev
Shira Lee Katz Board President —
Lucinda Lee Katz Board President —
Carolyn Spitz Treasurer —
Joel Kaufmann Secretary —
Susan S Blake Board Member —
Patricia De Luca Board Member —
Michele Corash Board Member —
Paula Gambs Board Member —
John Gambs Board Member —
Mary Harden Board Member —
Ching-Yee Hu Board Member —
Jeff Han Board Member —
Sue Larson Board Member —
Mark Salkind Board Member —
Caroline Wood Board Member —
Kate Rabbe Board Member —
Alisa Won Board Member —
David Taylor Executive Dir. —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Richard Lonsdorf Board Member 8.7% of Rev
Jenny Chisholm Treasurer 4.2% of Rev
Mark Salkind Board President —
Lucinda Lee Katz Board President —
Carolyn Spitz Treasurer —
Joel Kaufmann Secretary —
Susan S Blake Board Member —
Patricia De Luca Board Member —
John Gambs Board Member —
Paula Gambs Board Member —
Jefferson Han Board Member —
Mary Harden Board Member —
Ching-Yee Hu Board Member —
Shira Lee Katz Board Member —
Sue Larson Board Member —
Alisa Won Board Member —
Caroline Wood Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Richard Lonsdorf Board Member 4.5% of Rev
Jenny Chisholm Treasurer 3.3% of Rev
Mark Salkind Board President —
Lucinda Lee Katz Board President —
Carolyn Spitz Treasurer —
Joel Kaufmann Secretary —
Susan S Blake Board Member —
Patricia De Luca Board Member —
John Gambs Board Member —
Paula Gambs Board Member —
Jefferson Han Board Member —
Mary Harden Board Member —
Shira Lee Katz Board Member —
Sue Larson Board Member —
Alisa Won Board Member —
Caroline Wood Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.