Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | — | — | 33.8% | 36 | Governance-Stressed | Recovery | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 31 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 29 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2016 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | — | 21 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2010 | — | — | 0.6% | 28 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2021
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAMELA GREENAN | Board President | 27.1% of Rev | ||
| NANCY C JACOBS | Secretary | 6.8% of Rev | ||
| JANICE LH JACKSON | Treasurer | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 25 → 36 over 5 years (improving by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 33.8% is above the 90th percentile for orgs of this size (healthy band: 18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~24 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.