Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
36
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 22.7% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 22.2% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 19.7% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 12.0% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 7.6% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 4.8% 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 35 Fragile Recovery
2016 11.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 8.1% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nancy Severy Office Manager 7.5% of Rev
Marcia Sloane Bookkeeper 2.2% of Rev
Eva von Bahr Board President 1.1% of Rev
Abigail Strock Board Member 0.7% of Rev
Nathaniel Waletzko Board Member
Paul Sweigart Board Member
Susan Archuletta Board Member
Terry Knaus Secretary
Randy Masselink Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Abigail Strock Board Member
Paul Sweigart Board Member
Susan Archuletta Board Member
Nathaniel Waletzko Board Member
Richard Breen Treasurer
Terry Knaus Secretary
Eva von Bahr Board President
Marcia Sloane Bookkeeper
Nancy Severy Office Manager

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nancy Severy Office Manager 4.8% of Rev
Eva von Bahr Board President 2.4% of Rev
Abigail Roland Board Member 0.4% of Rev
Elizabeth Swenson Treasurer
Terry Knaus Secretary
Paul Sweigart Board Member
Richard Breen Board Member
Stan Malos Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 36 over 5 years (declining by 14 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.