Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 49 Fragile Recovery
2023 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 39 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NANCY BASS Board President
CAROL MACK VICE PRESIDE
TRICIA MANSFIELD Board Member
JOHN MCCALL Treasurer
SUE SHAFFER Board Member
DIANNA SHANDORF Secretary
SUSAN SINEATH Board Member
BABS VANYO Board Member
LINDA LOW WOLCOTT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NANCY BASS VICE PRESIDE
BINNEY FOUTS Board Member
CAROL HALL Board President
BETSY MARMET Board Member
JOHN MCCALL Board Member
PAT RICE Treasurer
PEGGY SEYBOLT Board Member
SUE SHAFFER Board Member
DIANNA SHANDORF Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 8 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 29 points above the peer median (50 vs. 21).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.