Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 5.0% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 6.7% 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 4.2% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 — — 8.1% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MYRA WEAVER Board President 17.2% of Rev
MYRA WEAVER Board President 17.2% of Rev
DAWN JANOSIK Vice President 8.9% of Rev
DAWN JANOSIK Vice President 8.9% of Rev
MYRNA DIXON Treasurer 7.3% of Rev
MYRNA DIXON Treasurer 7.3% of Rev
SHIRI HUS Board Member —
PATTY KOPELMAN Board Member —
ALICIA HOGGES-THOMAS Board Member —
TARRA GUERRA Board Member —
ARMANDO GOMEZ Board Member —
JASON WEAVER Board Member —
CHAUNCEY PATTERSON Board Member —
JUDGE LINDA PRATT Board Member —
MANDEE ADLER Board Member —
SHIRI HUS Board Member —
PATTY KOPELMAN Board Member —
ALICIA HOGGES-THOMAS Board Member —
TARRA GUERRA Board Member —
ARMANDO GOMEZ Board Member —
JASON WEAVER Board Member —
CHAUNCEY PATTERSON Board Member —
JUDGE LINDA PRATT Board Member —
MANDEE ADLER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MYRA WEAVER Board President 17.2% of Rev
DAWN JANOSIK Vice President 10.5% of Rev
MYRNA DIXON Treasurer 7.1% of Rev
ALBERT FRANK VICE PRESIDE —
ARMANDO GOMEZ Board Member —
JASON WEAVER Board Member —
CHAUNCEY PATTERSON Board Member —
JUDGE LINDA PRATT Board Member —
MANDEE ADLER Board Member —
LINDA LEALI ESQ Board Member —
SHIRI HUS Board Member —
PATTY KOPELMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MYRA WEAVER Board President 11.0% of Rev
DAWN JANOSIK Vice President 6.8% of Rev
MYRNA DIXON Treasurer 4.7% of Rev
ALBERT FRANK VICE PRESIDE —
ARMANDO GOMEZ Board Member —
JASON WEAVER Board Member —
CHAUNCEY PATTERSON Board Member —
JUDGE LINDA PRATT Board Member —
MANDEE ADLER Board Member —
SHIRI HUS Board Member —
PATTY KOPELMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 478 other orgs in FL with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 54 points below the peer median (0 vs. 54).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 29 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.